Да, я правда глуп и туп =). Постараюсь больше не задавать однотипные вопросы)

Да я просто думать не хотел и полез быстрей на форум. Больше такое не повториться, сам буду пытаться разбираться =)

как инжектить в процесс gta_sa.exe через exe file код на lua или же файл lua

luajit + luaxx.dll

ток хз что тебе даст голое луа в гташке, разве что подключить какие-то либы на работу с памятью и сделать свое крутое апи как у мунлоадера..

1) Вопрос:

Приветствую.

Возник вопрос касательно C++, очень желаю получить ответ с прикрепленными строчками кода и требуемыми инклудами. Смотрите.

Мне нужно сделать так, чтобы в игровой чат вместо меня писала программа. Я уже научился открывать и закрывать чат (имитация нажатия клавиши), так же у меня есть строка (string) с текстом. Надо, чтобы оно типо вводило этот текст, не смотря на текущий язык на моей клавиатуре. ЭТО НЕОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО ДЛЯ САМПА, НЕ НАДО МНЕ КИДАТЬ ССЫЛКУ НА САМПФУНКС С УЖЕ ГОТОВОЙ ВСТРОЕННОЙ ФУНКЦИЕЙ ОТПРАВКИ СООБЩЕНИЯ.

Если ты открываешь чат с помощью имитации нажатия клавиши, в чем проблема с помощью имитаций напечатать текст?

What is the best & safest way to clean std::string from memory ?

std::string example;

1. example.clear();

2. example.resize(0);

3. std::fill(example.begin(), example.end(), 0);

example.clear(), example.shrink_to_fit();

fQuaternion Hello i need help i want to know how to get my vehicle(vehicledata) on raknet to turn to the xyz i set to it, and also the code i send speed to the xyz i set to it and also the speed setting

And also forging my direction(aimdata)

Hi there, such a cool question. Basically, have to distinguish what does "best & safest" mean in that context

By the rules of RTTI, standard definition of an object constructed in some arbitrary block (let's not include here some special cases like overloaded form of operator new()) will be destructed at the end of that block

C++:







So you ain't gotta do that by yourself, no such need for neither .resize, nor free(), delete(), std::fill and others

In case 'safest method' stands for making sure data you operate within act must be zeroed / cleared, especially in cases when std::string will be used for storing sensitive data (passwords and others), well, there's no portable and unambiguous answer.

Doing manual .clear call does not give any guarantee that this call won't be optimized

Proof: https://godbolt.org/z/rdCQyQ

Same goes for the std::basic_string::~basic_string, it might or mightn't clear used memory

libc++, for example, does this

libcxx/include/string at master · llvm-mirror/libcxx

Project moved to: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project - llvm-mirror/libcxx

github.com


For a kick-off, there's has to be some function to do zeroing above some memory block with confidentially that this call/expression won't be optimized away by the compiler.

You might take a look at the following:

1) memset_s from C11. Even though it must be portable, there are some problems with C11 in, for instance, Visual Studio. Moreover, __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ and __STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ must be used in any platform and there's another possible issue - MacOS might not work with those macroeses.

Код:







2) write memset_s by yourself, don't miss volatile modifier

Код:









3) User platform-provided solutions

bzero on macOS doesn't have any rule for compiler optimizations, so skip that

SecureZeroMemory on Windows does exactly what needed

SecureZeroMemory function (Windows)

docs.microsoft.com


Secondly, there's a need to know what is the way zeroing might be perfomed

1) direct data access

Before c++17, you could give a try to &str[0], but it has undefined behavior when pos == size()

Since c++17, std::basic_string::data will return non const pointer if target string was not const

2) might try std::allocator by calling std::string::get_allocator, but it's sort of deprecated

To implement this like it should be in modern c++, you can try usual class inheritance, but i'd like to recommend do this with std::unique_ptr, since it has support for the disposal function

Of course, this doesn't cover cases you're dealing with classical OOP model and can do cleaning at your class destructor

Here are the tests i've done

Live: http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/a08b5ab2257acbab

Think I described it in the way you needed, I mean I correctly represented a word "safest"

By the way, take a look how it's implemented in, for instance, chromium project

chromium/third_party/unrar/src/secpassword.cpp at 6efa1184771ace08f3e2162b0255c93526d1750d · chromium/chromium

The official GitHub mirror of the Chromium source. Contribute to chromium/chromium development by creating an account on GitHub.

github.com